Scope & role mapping
Assess Article 2 exposure, EU nexus, provider/deployer/importer/distributor roles, GPAI relationships and relevant exceptions.
EU AI Act advisory
EU AI Act advisory for U.S. companies that need practical implementation, not generic policy.
We assess your AI systems, determine which EU AI Act obligations apply, and turn them into a defensible implementation plan covering roles, controls, documentation, owners and evidence.
EUAIACTUS.COM is Lexara Advisory LLC’s specialist EU AI Act advisory service for U.S. and cross-border organisations.
Core engagements
EU AI Act compliance services
AI system inventory
Create a system-level inventory covering intended purpose, users, affected persons, models, vendors, data flows, jurisdictions and deployment context.
Prohibited-practice review
Screen use cases against Article 5 and the current Commission implementation materials before downstream classification work.
Article 50 transparency readiness
Map user disclosures, machine-readable marking, deepfake/public-interest content duties and implementation evidence for rules applying from August 2026.
High-risk AI classification readiness
Assess Annex III and product-linked risk pathways, intended purpose, exceptions and the evidence needed for 2027/2028 readiness.
GPAI governance
Map model-provider and downstream obligations, documentation interfaces, systemic-risk questions and Code of Practice implications.
AI literacy implementation
Design role-sensitive measures to support AI literacy under amended Article 4, based on actual personnel, systems and risk context.
Governance & evidence architecture
Define accountability, policy, risk management, vendor controls, human oversight, documentation, monitoring and implementation ownership.
EU AI Act + GDPR governance
For AI systems processing personal data, coordinate AI Act role/classification with GDPR Article 3 scope, Article 22, DPIAs, transparency, data transfers and vendor obligations.
Ways to engage
Three practical starting points
Start with the smallest engagement that resolves the real uncertainty. The Professional Scope Review is the default entry point when applicability, role or classification is not yet fixed.
Recommended first engagement
Professional EU AI Act Scope Review
For companies that need to know whether the EU AI Act applies, which actor role they occupy, how systems should be classified and what obligations follow.
- Applicability and role analysis.
- Priority obligation map.
- Key evidence gaps and unresolved facts.
- Recommended next-step roadmap.
Governance & Implementation
For organisations that already know they are in scope and need controls, ownership, documentation, vendor requirements, monitoring and evidence architecture.
Cross-Border Readiness
For U.S. companies entering or serving Europe that need coordinated EU AI Act, GDPR and operational readiness across products, vendors and internal teams.
Deliverables
What a project should leave behind
Applicability & role memo
A fact-specific record of why the Act, role and obligation set do or do not apply.
AI system register
A structured inventory that can support classification, governance and future updates.
Obligation/control matrix
Requirements translated into controls, owners, evidence and implementation gaps.
Prioritised roadmap
Work sequenced by legal applicability, effective date, risk and operational dependency.
Engagement principle
Compliance work should follow the system, not the buzzword.
The same organisation can simultaneously act as provider, deployer or downstream user across different AI systems. We scope at system and use-case level before assigning obligations.